The Horror of Qui Tacet Consentire Videtur

| 6 Comments
"Qui tacet consentire videtur" is a Latin phrase the law translates into:  "Silence equals consent."

Qui tacet consentire videtur -- is a dangerous phrase because it protects the powerful and suffers the weak.

"Say nothing and I'll know what to do!" How many empires have been lost in the unspoken, but direct, acquiescence to horror?

Silence also equals abuse.  "She never said 'no'!" takes on a whole new wringing and rhythm under the "qui tacet consentire videtur" definition. 


The lesson in qui tacet consentire videtur is to never remain unspoken.

Define yourself with words.

Communicate your wishes and hopes and defiance with sentences and utterances.

Silence does equal death -- and that death comes in many forms and shapes and the one pressing qui tacet consentire videtur into you is not your friend or your protector.

That person is your persecutor.

Related Entries

6 Comments

Happened during the war, David. If you aren't with us you're against us. If you're against the war you're against the soldiers. No flag pin means you're saying your anti-America. All accusations by inferring silence or pushing it on someone.

Right on, Anne! They force you into agreeing with them by making you shut your mouth.

Hi David,

I have heard the same saying in my childhood in Sanskrit as belongs to the same family of Latin. It goes like - "Mounam Sammati Lakshanam".

http://proverbmountain.blogspot.com/2005/11/sanskrit-proverbs.html

I 100% agree with it, it's extremely important to communicate - be it in life, business or politics.

Anything unspoken is confusing and leads to ambiguity.

You're certainly right about that, Katha. I love the Sanskrit proverb!

Is silence ambiguous? I think silence allows other people to imprint their desires in your silence -- and that's the lesson of the danger of saying nothing.

Hi David,

Right, the reason I said silence was ambiguous because it would work "against" the person who was silent, would work "for" the other who interpreted the silence the way they want and there was also a third party who would be "confused" because of this.

Makes sense?

Yes, Katha, it makes great sense, thanks!

Leave a comment

Search BolesBlogs.com Logo
Panopticonic.com Logo
10txt.com Logo
CarceralNation.com Logo
DramaticMedicine.com Logo
ScientificAesthetic.com Logo
Memeingful.com Logo
UrbanSemiotic.com Logo
RelationShaping.com Logo
David W. Boles' WordPunk Logo Small
Boles Books Writing and Publishing Logo Small
Hardcore ASL Logo Small
David W. Boles
Script Professor Logo Small
Boles University Logo Small
David W. Boles' Celebrity Semiotic Logo Small

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by David W. Boles published on October 2, 2008 10:55 AM.

Black: The Indian Helen Keller Movie was the previous entry in this blog.

Generational Wrongs is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

  • David W. Boles: Yes, Katha, it makes great sense, thanks! read more
  • Kathakali Chatterjee: Hi David, Right, the reason I said silence was ambiguous read more
  • David W. Boles: You're certainly right about that, Katha. I love the Sanskrit read more
  • Kathakali Chatterjee: Hi David, I have heard the same saying in my read more
  • David W. Boles: Right on, Anne! They force you into agreeing with them read more
  • ANNE: Happened during the war, David. If you aren't with us read more